Evaluating AI Orchestration Platforms: A Buyer's Checklist
Twenty questions to ask an AI orchestration vendor before signing — covering observability, cost controls, audit trails, vendor lock-in, and human-in-the-loop.
How to use this checklist
This is the list of questions we wish more buyers asked us. Walking through it with any vendor — including AioClaw — will surface the difference between a polished demo and a platform that survives production.
Architecture (5 questions)
- Is the platform model-agnostic, or locked to one LLM provider?
- Can we bring our own agent code, or only configure the vendor's primitives?
- How is context shared between agents — chat log, summary, or graph?
- What runs serverless, what runs on persistent workers, and who pays for idle?
- What's the upgrade path when a new model class (multimodal, reasoning, on-device) ships?
Observability (4 questions)
- Can we trace a single user request across every agent, tool and model call?
- Are token counts, costs and latencies attributed per task, not just per call?
- Can we replay a failed run with the exact inputs that produced it?
- Do logs, traces and metrics export to our existing stack (Datadog, OpenTelemetry, etc.)?
Cost controls (3 questions)
- Can we set hard ceilings per agent, per user, per workflow?
- Does the scheduler route to cheaper providers when latency allows?
- What's the unit economics story — is pricing per seat, per token, per task, or per agent-hour?
Safety and audit (4 questions)
- Can we enforce that certain actions require human approval before execution?
- Is every tool call signed and immutable for audit?
- What's the data residency model — where do prompts, outputs and embeddings live?
- How are secrets and customer-scoped tokens isolated between tenants?
People and process (4 questions)
- Can non-engineers ship a new agent, or does every change route through ML?
- What's the time-to-first-agent-in-production for a new team?
- How are agent regressions caught — eval suites, shadow runs, A/B?
- What does the runbook look like when an agent misbehaves at 3am?
Red flags
- Demos that only work with the vendor's own LLM.
- "Cost optimization" that's really just a cheaper default model.
- No per-task tracing — only per-conversation.
- Human-in-the-loop that blocks the whole graph instead of one branch.
- Pricing that scales with agents but not with usage — or vice versa.
Terms in this post: LLMEmbeddingsHuman-in-the-Loop